Lidl v Tesco – Court docket of Attraction overturns copyright infringement discovering – Model Slux

Lidl v Tesco – Court docket of Attraction overturns copyright infringement discovering – Model Slux

On 19 March 2024, the Court docket of Attraction handed down its resolution on the enchantment within the Lidl v Tesco case ([2024] EWCA Civ 262), holding as follows.   First occasion (Excessive Court docket) resolution Court docket of Attraction ruling Copyright infringement Overturned (enchantment allowed) Commerce mark infringement Upheld (enchantment dismissed) Passing off Upheld … Read more

Deutsche Financial institution v RusChemAlliance and Unicredit Financial institution v Ruschemalliance. The Court docket of Attraction confirming London because the go to court docket for arbitral anti-suit at the least in case of English regulation because the lex contractus (and the lengthy arm of UKSC Vedanta). – Model Slux

Deutsche Financial institution v RusChemAlliance and Unicredit Financial institution v Ruschemalliance. The Court docket of Attraction confirming London because the go to court docket for arbitral anti-suit at the least in case of English regulation because the lex contractus (and the lengthy arm of UKSC Vedanta). – Model Slux

Replace 13 March 2024 Paul MacMAhon studies the case goes to the UKSC. I’m mopping up the weblog queue so forgive me for posting late on Deutsche Financial institution v RusChemAlliance [2023] EWCA Civ 1144, a profitable attraction of SQD v QYP (Rev1) [2023] EWHC 2145 (Comm). (Common readers of the weblog know that I … Read more